|
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
The member of the Bundestag JXrg Tauss, as a result of the discharge of the Zugangserschwerungsgesetzes (/news/wirtschaft/recht_gesetz/2009/juni/bundestag_gesetz_internetsperren/) to the blockage of Internet sites with child-pornographic contents to the pirate's party changed (/news/wirtschaft/recht_gesetz/2009/juni/spd politiker_internetsperren_partei/), if the argumentative law wants to check up before the Federal Constitutional Court. more... (/news/wirtschaft/recht_gesetz/2009/juli/verfassungsgericht_netzsperren/)
|
|
#2 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
Will not come through Unconstitutional and with it abgeharkt!
If by comes cars burn, not because of me indeed the too extreme port Estonian will come. |
|
#3 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
If by comes cars burn,[...]
in rich in Frank maybe ![]() here goes protest, however, rather seldom on straXen, one swallows rather awfully a lot shits and does not go from rache choose. konzept, unfortunately, really what does not bring:rolleyes |
|
#4 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
The purpose heilligt the means heist it though,, however, anyhow the bitter flavour if remains I to Mr. Taus thinks. He claimed, To do ies for which there are authorities, then lands in an investigation. It may be thus like he says, but even though schmeist it absolutely no good light. I am curious sometimes like it will go on in this thing with the web barrier.
|
|
#5 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
Find I well. is only hopefully objective constitutional court and acts like it should be. I mine them are not also any more jungsten and are not informed about Internet also so fantastically.
|
|
#6 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
The contents does not interest the court. The court interests Put and whether things there with are possible, against the constitution speak...
|
|
#7 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
The law does not itch me meanwhile any more, why also. It was proved like incapable our representatives in this area are, the stop signs can handle at few moments, and, besides, it is no matter whether they now (like supposedly exclusively) before KiPo to contents stand or really to the censorship are abused. The C64 generation would be cut off even in the worst case not by him what she would like to reach, solely people with hardly available interest in the Internet would get stuck in the barriers. And these make Largely the voter just of those parties from which this spiritual afterbirth of an actionism-impregnated election campaign beginning have committed a crime.
bad omen there or here, ours zerebral cored politician at most harm themselves with the law, the mature citizen will not look around and walk on other ways, even if the BVG generously Looking away and "predicate: Especially valuably" claps on censorship products. letting them make what they want, the elections come, there one can point them what the people of them hold. And even if one chooses only in protest the pirates, if this is better immernoch than a refused voice or even a cross with our beloved ones, to big parties. |
|
#8 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
Binn sometimes tensely what there comes out, do not last very much interesant if Put there would stand firm.
|
|
#9 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
Exactly
hopefully wirde then also with europa far dropped
|
|
#10 ()
|
|||
|
|||
constitutional court should decide on net barriers
People, properly read! With this complaint it is not about this *zensiert:evillol* law. It is about the question, whether the way of the decision has been legal-compliant in the Bundestag or not. If one liked to initiate a law, if one must keep to the parliamentary order *hXstel*. And, on this occasion, there is / is criticism, the fact that it was just not with right things. Whether changes in the access aggravation law even with a decision positive (from our point of view) of the Federal Constitutional Court a little bit, remains to wait. I hardly believe, the fact that Messrs. Politiker her nice healthy world will be deprived.
, By the way, the film "V came a few days ago like Vendetta". Some of you have appealed to him over and over again; I myself did not know him yet. Indeed, the parallels are remarkable. Unfortunately, there is moments, where one can reach with nice words nothing more and must really put sign. But what would be, if we went out into the streets? If you believe, the security forces will use not all means available to them and shoot if necessary also? I for my part see the whole development with concern. What Zensursula concerns: As soon as I see this woman or read only from her, goes off me. Their false holiness and incompetence stink to the sky. It is disgusting, if one arranges for instruments abused children, to distinguish itself and the population consciously on fictitious or stooped Pseudo facts feeds, to initiate a law, which strengthens the glass citizen further. Bah, Zensursula! Astonishingly is also to be read in this connection, the fact that not a few they associate with propaganda minister Goebbel. So if liberally minded people, NO extremists of any camp are, such a thing say, if one can estimate, how deeply "our" politician's caste has sunk.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|