|
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
Little hello, I wanted a new graphics map buying / ordering to me in close future. Now the question positions itself to me, whether on long view (without consideration of DX11) an acquisition of the GTX260 is still worthwhile or a GTX275 should be considered., On this occasion, I have bumped directly into 2 maps:
map 1 ( www.hoh.de/Default.aspx?TY=2&ST=1&IT=97772&CT=8750) map 2 ( www.hoh.de/Hardware/Grafik / video / TV Karten/NVIDIA/PCIe/GTX 275 / Palit GTX 275 896 mb GDDR3 PCIe_i8114_90639.htm) Speaking, on this occasion, something against one of both maps or even both? Desweiteren I have doubt concerning my at the moment obstructed net part. It concerns, on this occasion, one of Chieftec (500W) with the following values: 12V1 16A , 12V2 18A and 12V3 18A Also here I would be very grateful about advice. to thanks already once in prerau! MfG tronicr |
|
#2 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
Pioneering differences gibts between the maps not, will probably have with both quite good performance. Watch what the maps for demands for the NT put and decides you simply for one. DX 11 one can think about it if it is out and fully integrated, then the prices are also right.
Both maps have a top PLV are quick and, in principle, it had to do all the same his which one you take, sometimes apart from the manufacturer, there thus everybody has be own concocting, I find Asus good because the map not rumzickt:lol |
|
#3 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
According to some assessments "whimpering" so crude ones should not appear with the above maps, how with maps of other manufacturers. Moreover, there should be Distinguishing between the variety in net parts and state one, the fact that could run without problems or. then also runs or one should reach to a stronger net part. This is quite bewildering. On the official side of Nvidia one becomes with him 260 him! at least! 500-W-net part asks and for 275 he min. 550, and 275 he uses only 20 30 W more. If this has of You already jmd. tested or knows erfahrungsgmXXig o.X. about that give?
|
|
#4 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
You have not exactly one About About that brand net part, but I believe it should still reach. What have you else inserted for components?
|
|
#5 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
nen Intel of C2D e8400 gigabyte of GA EP31 DS3L (P31 he) 4 GB of Kingston 800 him 640 GB of record and just nen DVD distiller (+ accordingly the Graka)
|
|
#6 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
So mine 260 him runs with nem 425 W Enermax...but is just rather efficiently...
|
|
#7 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
NT moderately I see no problems with both maps. Which you select, depends, primarily, on your budget and of it, when you consider an other armament (headword (G (T) 300).
Mfg |
|
#8 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
Everything clearly. It will probably become the GTX275. The nevertheless low surcharge should be already worthwhile according to some Benchmarks. At the moment she should serve for ArmA2 and for both soon coming titles "Modern Warfare 2" and "OPF: Dragon Rising". If with the net part should not clap, nevertheless, if still the option of the exchange exists
Herewith a hearty one "thank you" to You. MfG tronicr |
|
#9 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
Have the Palit GTX275 with nem Oced Quad,8 GB Ram etc.. in an Enermax Liberty 500 run, and no probleme ... from there, take the GTX 275 and a suitable NT ... then this already fits ...
|
|
#10 ()
|
|||
|
|||
GTX260 or GTX275? Net part-technical?
Actually, I wanted to get no new net part.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|