Hello,
I would briefly need your help,

I search 1 TB for hard disk and me would interest, what I must pay attention by the purchase to.
In which I recognise which version of a hard disk the last is? Has given some time ago sometimes problems with the Fireware... Having somebody is explained a link where, how many flat are sensible or. their effects?

What you from the WD Black Caviar WD1001FALS hold

Because HDDs are updated over and over again, if one cannot select to himself the "newest" version so in trade. This bug with the proficient product gabs with Seagates in 7200.11, IT and records ES2 and some Maxtor. I recommend you Hitachi 7K1000.B ( www..de / preisvergleich / a391157.html)
It has of 3 flat in it, is very quick and has short access times of 12,8ms in contrast to the competition with ~16 17ms. She is quietly also. I have 2 pieces of it with myself in use application.

So with accessed Hitachi is loudly. If AAM is activated then though it is quiet, but then are also zugriffszeiten with 17ms.

Best of all on it they pay attention little flat has ^^

@lxmichi: Want you to use them as a system record or as a data record? does it go to you honour around transfer rates or around Lautheit?

OK briefly to the explanation...
Having at the moment 200Gb Festallte with 2 partitions! 50Gb Windows and 115 for installed plays.

400Gb hard disk without part ions as a storage space for music, Videos, DvD rep and, above all, pictures!

Now I would begin with pleasure so, the 1TB purely, everything what memory uses there up. 200 GB of hard disk comes out. And 400 GB of hard disk remains as a buffer record (I sort with pleasure a record fully to me then sometime the data on the 1TB festival-flat mXll)

in the foreground stands quality! She should not break after 2 weeks (as it was the case with a friend)
And volume, now, well, she must not be specially according to

OK what this does not precipitate there is not also under the best company this can happen., However, with the least failure rates I have sometimes with PC Games hardware a report WD are seen and, hence, one could recommend you there buy more. But if one itself thus test reports considers Seagate and Samsung is not much also worse or is better.

But with the least failure rates I have sometimes with PC Games hardware a report WD are seen and, hence, one could recommend you there buy more. But if one itself thus test reports considers Seagate and Samsung is not much also worse or is better.
This is the problem, they give to themselves there mutually nothing. So one can also not say directly which one should buy.
then I will decide Hitachi and the WD a little bit googlen and me. Maybe I find a few more good test reports.

For the time being thank you

So with accessed Hitachi is loudly.

I do not find Hitachi at all according to again is, anyhow everybody feels this differently.

Well, I have 3 WD6400AAKS and have to me 2 1TB Hitachi 7K1000.B in addition bought.
The WDs one easily hears with accessed, but one has heard Hitachi already very clearly.
And if AAM is active, then are as quiet grad sometimes as the WDs without AAM, have for it, however, of course higher zugriffszeit. I do not know of course like according to such a 1TB Caviar Black or Green in compare would be, or samsung f1.

So I have bought in vast majority always records WD (and werds possibly also act furthermore) and can say in addition sometimes clearly, the fact that the Zugriffsrattern quietly or according to would be one can say so not at all if I deactivate AAM (what must be made new with me only with CrystalDiskInfo after every start, because this scrap metal P45 Board how much offers a lot of scrap metal P45 Boards no set-up setting for it and simply switches on it by every start) today my WD7500AYYS are just according to in the accesses, how other loud hard disks, these were not they, however, in the first weeks after introduction yet, in the beginning they were quite quiet, if they are not, however, any more.