It is known adequately, the fact that with the WD Caviar Blue the 640FLAT BARGE is quicker, as 500 GB of counterpart, because it is based on 2 flat technologies... Now puts to itself to me the question, whether is with the Caviar Black just.
exact should screw together said I soon nen calculator. The volume makes no difference, my mate (for whom the calculator should be) stores at most 400 GB in data, what is called, the fact that 500 GB would reach laxly...
There itself 640 GB Caviar Blue and 500 GB Caviar Black in similar prize situation consider,if the question positions itself to me now, which is quicker.
Being the Black only as 640 GB faster than 640 GB Blue, or also 500 GB of model???
Having somebody comparative Benchmarks?
Gibts else shoots up alternative in this prize area?

One cannot say this maybe so, but I would also say one him did not make a distinction feel notices, so from my view all the same which you take. Black is quicker, in any case, with data copy or installation than a Blue, however, together in a series they do not take really what.

Determines 640 GB Blue. Have only letzen a contribution to him compare written (sometimes look)., In any case, is very quick the Blue with 2 flat and is favorable.unfortunately, Having sometimes a 1TB Black tested and that was minimally slower. Well she has 5-year guarantee, but for it she is too expensive. in 3 years looks welt anyhow completely different. is with 500 GB Black version either flat in it. However, 500 GB of flat pose rather problems and, moreover, several records should raise also the transfer rate (like RAID 0). Should she have 2x 250 GB of records it is slower anyhow because from old production come and nunmal are clearly slow. result: Take BLUE

It is known adequately, the fact that with the WD Caviar Blue the 640FLAT BARGE is quicker, as 500 GB of counterpart, because it is based on 2 flat technologies... how many more flatly a festival-flat has makes no difference, since more more flatly raise only lautstXrke + temperaturen. it is important, how much on flatter fits or. how high the data-thick is (Xberlicherweise in gb per quadratzoll given). 640 gb to flat ones have 333 gb more flatly (333, because same technik is used also with in 1000 ern) and 500 gb flat 250 gb. Now puts to itself to me the question, whether is with the Caviar Black just. with one with 640 gb already. There itself 640 GB Caviar Blue and 500 GB Caviar Black in similar prize situation consider,if the question positions itself to me now, which is quicker. with 640 gb. pay attention, however, also modellbezeichnung, since meanwhile gibts already 500 gb more flatly, which own only one more flatly and are flatter again quick than 333 gb. now, however, exact bezeichnung I do not know, but anyhow aajs it should be. Being the Black only as 640 GB faster than 640 GB Blue, or also 500 GB of model???
640 gb are quicker and quicker than 500 gb (ausnahme see above about that). black serie is the always quickest from all and has longest garantiezeit (5 jahre). whether this predivides become apparent, know none of us, since according to einsatz from programmen (is used cache completely and efficiently?) this varies very strongly. by einsatz from fastcopy ( www.ipmsg.org/tools/fastcopy.html.en) z.b. is noticeably reduced kopiervorgang with 32 mb cache (fills cache everybody hdd completely and then reads / writes only).

Everything clearly, pointed looks is the Caviar Blue the best choice, or. find I 8XX X and the following X Xr 2 3% too much....

Here ( www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=3757873#post3757873) one can see the difference between WD6400AAKS (Blue) and EEL (Black) good.

All together one can say, the fact that the differences are so marginal, the fact that they NEVER strike in the real life.
Because the brake z.B the interface USB is, or the DVD/BR disk drive. for memory-intensive uses ists better 12 GB Ram reinzupackenm, instead of 1 or 2% quicker and for it vieleicht pure record.
I have the WD Blue 320 GB (1 flat), very fast, very quiet.

For memory-intensive uses ists better 12 GB Ram reinzupackenm, instead of 1 or 2% quicker and for it vieleicht pure record. and, nevertheless, has to go back everything again on the flat one, what does not justify 12 gb ram at all. btw determines slowest glied (here festival-flat) all other.