hallo, I hope, I am here in right unterforum. I have also ventured sometimes a little bit in Xbertakten and mine e6600 on 3,2 ghz hochgetaktet (voltage on auto). in the beginning is rechner already with 2,55 ghz lubricated, what has ascertained like me in arbeitsspeicher lies. I have put on unlinked and by hand on 850mhz getaktet (already with 866mhz becomes rechner unstable).
my first one asks is, how does he affect made a distinction linked to unlinked on performance? if it made reflect, to change on quicker speicher and to pursue this then linked or are they would make a distinction marginal?

my second one asks is, if it made reflect, to put by hand cpu spannung? I had them only with 1,4 volt by hand and takt on 3,21 ghz. then has gambled a little gothic 3. when I have made next Xbertaktungsversuche, have failed and I takt again on 3,21 ghz has reduced, became rechner then instabiel, so that I on 3,2 ghz and autovoltage had to move.

You have a system FSB, The bottleneck is of the FSB, if the memory 1:1 is to the FSB getaktet he brings optimum achievement, it is faster free of charge. If Your FSB is higher than the memory this taken quicker memory brings points, but not because he is quicker, but because you can faster pursue the CPU.

Being probably with you still long not the case, or?

www.hardwareluxx.de/community/showthread.php? t=389575

... unlinked! Linked makes with your working memory what wants it and there is the question, does your working memory take part in this? With the Xbertakten always the Vcore by hand put. On car a too high Vcore can lie close fast. Like HisN writes the theoretical optimum is with the divisor 1:1. If your memory with 400 Mhz works, if a FSB of 400 Mhz was the best, indeed, then your CPU runs with a multinational of 9 with 3,6 Ghz. With 3,2 Ghz the memory with 700 Mhz (2xFSB 355) runs. Whether does the memory there still run optimally? What do for memory you have?

OK speicher may run quietly more slowly than fsb, indeed, I lose leistung (something so I already imagined). but how much leistung this is real? if we talk here from several prozent and he only in promill bereich, so rather theoretically as really noticeable?

@nicoc: it can be, that borad mine cpu with auto v core suddenly sometimes 1,6 volt reinjagd and cpu with it toasts if I pech has?

achso nochwas: mine bios brags fsb (if he is this) with 14xx, what seemed to me a little bit strangely and the whole one proves with multi (9) also not takt cpu. I know this still from athlonzeiten, that one of 200, 266, 333, etc.. sometimes multi on cpu takt came. what exactly is then this in 1421 mhz?

... you can select the Vcore of values with Core Temp/CPU z. Should everything remain under load with the setting "a car" within the scope of, if "car" also goes. Whether the stability remains protected is another question. Best of all you approach to a stable Vcore value (manual setting, however, max.. 1,35 Vcore for everyday company with good cooling). If you are contented then with the achieved frequency, if you are able z.B. E.I.SEE.T. and activate C1E again.

to let go more slowly The memory than the FSB makes no sense as long as the memory not Xbertaktet becomes. As said, with a DDR2 800 Mhz this corresponds to a FSB of 400Mhz and an E6600@4 Ghz.

More slowly than FSB goes (nevertheless, even) not (I always thought), but because it is the GDR, it is calculated anyhow sometimes 2. If we hope do not blether there each other past

result to my link, there are Benches.

...what exactly is then this in 1421 mhz?

This is of the Quadpumped FSB. Intel gives him thus. 1421:4=355. 355*9=3200mhz.

thank you baumfreund, this was a very good one point with it I can start what. I have up to now only athlons up to xp Xbertaktet, because gabs this not yet.@HisN: with unlinked I am able cpu and ram arbitrarily and completely independently of each other takten. ram as said on 850 mhz, cpu on 3,2 ghz. (really pi 1 m proved 16,092, what according to bestenliste c2d 65nm 3,2 corresponds). so had to go cpu takt from 3,2 ghz really funktioniern.

But with 3,Nevertheless, 2Ghz you pursue the CPU with a certain FSB (under 400) and the RAM with a FSB more than 400, nevertheless, so the RAM is not at all slow as the FSB. As said, the FSB gets not to use to capacity it sometimes the range RAM if you pursue it 1:1.

If we hope do not blether there each other past... so I with certainty not: z.B. E6600 FSB 400Mhz x 9 (therefore 3,6 Ghz), DDR2 400Mhz x 2 (therefore 800Mhz). Then divisor would be 1:1. On account of FSB 400Mhz and RAM with 333Mhz (667) runs, however, I have never tried out. EDIT: already see, I was not meant.