: :
SpicyGreenIguana  
Forum Newest Posts Userlist Archive Register
Search Forums:
»  SpicyGreenIguana » Main memory, mainboards and CPUs » Mainboards and CPUs: Overclocking  » Vcore variation

Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 11:37 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 963
Default 

Vcore variation


Hi

I seat-just here and Xbertakte my CPU (see sig). of banality has struck with , that I, nevertheless, rather strong vcore schwankungen . I suppose , the fact that I have so also so bad results OC. with 3.4 ghz and 1.In 4375 vcore becomes to me from CPU Z just 1.36 vcore under Prime95 indicated. after some minuten gibts a Bluescreen , 1.36 vcore is fine not enough for 3.4ghz. with 3.0ghz and 1.35 vcore points with cpu z even 1.28 vcore in.
Being the variations not a little bit too largely?
to thanks for your help
Reply With Quote
  #2 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 11:42 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 460
Default 

Vcore variation


Between Idle and load gibts always a certain variation. This lies primarily with the Board and his tension converters. Which tension is indicated then in Idle?
Reply With Quote
  #3 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 11:44 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 0
Default 

Vcore variation


Hi

it can also come from netzteil it simply she did not read schaft.
lg
Reply With Quote
  #4 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 11:47 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 963
Default 

Vcore variation


I know , the fact that there is always schwankungen , however, mine I find a little bit too strongly
in idle becomes 1.39 indicated
is eig still en a little bit not enough

thought, actually, thus 0,01 schwankung would be normal??



@Mente:
net part exclude I sometimes
is an Enermax per 625
at the moment is even gtx260 in it , already had 2 gtx285 in it and it has run
Reply With Quote
  #5 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 11:49 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 460
Default 

Vcore variation


Yes, the net part sit also partly for something like that responsibly, but an Enermax 625 W is well prepared for something like that.

from 1,From 39 to 1,Moreover, 36 is normal.
Reply With Quote
  #6 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 11:56 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 963
Default 

Vcore variation


even if it, actually, 1.In 4375 should be?
I mine read is nearly 0.08 less than opposed
Reply With Quote
  #7 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 12:40 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,995
Default 

Vcore variation


you can put Loadlinecalibration on enabled ,if board this offers feature. then becomes in bios opposed one worth ,also identically assumed . and this high schwankungen well-balanced .
Reply With Quote
  #8 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 12:55 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 859
Default 

Vcore variation


A discrepancy from up to 0,1 V between BIOS setting and load Vcore under Prime95 is normal and Intel specification corresponds. (headwords: Vdroop, Voffset)

MfG Monday
Reply With Quote
  #9 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 01:05 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 295
Default 

Vcore variation


Only the fact that it is here about a processor AMD. , Nevertheless, should not be different this with much.
Reply With Quote
  #10 ()  
Old 07-06-2009, 01:09 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 859
Default 

Vcore variation


Fact, this is valid for that, however resembles so far I know.
The physically unavoidable tension points can also not spirit away AMD. (I should look rather sometimes in the signatures...)

MfG Monday
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82