|
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
Hi
I seat-just here and Xbertakte my CPU (see sig). of banality has struck with , that I, nevertheless, rather strong vcore schwankungen . I suppose , the fact that I have so also so bad results OC. with 3.4 ghz and 1.In 4375 vcore becomes to me from CPU Z just 1.36 vcore under Prime95 indicated. after some minuten gibts a Bluescreen , 1.36 vcore is fine not enough for 3.4ghz. with 3.0ghz and 1.35 vcore points with cpu z even 1.28 vcore in. Being the variations not a little bit too largely? to thanks for your help |
|
#2 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
Between Idle and load gibts always a certain variation. This lies primarily with the Board and his tension converters. Which tension is indicated then in Idle?
|
|
#3 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
Hi
it can also come from netzteil it simply she did not read schaft. lg |
|
#4 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
I know , the fact that there is always schwankungen , however, mine I find a little bit too strongly
in idle becomes 1.39 indicated is eig still en a little bit not enough thought, actually, thus 0,01 schwankung would be normal?? @Mente: net part exclude I sometimes is an Enermax per 625 at the moment is even gtx260 in it , already had 2 gtx285 in it and it has run |
|
#5 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
Yes, the net part sit also partly for something like that responsibly, but an Enermax 625 W is well prepared for something like that.
from 1,From 39 to 1,Moreover, 36 is normal. |
|
#6 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
even if it, actually, 1.In 4375 should be?
I mine read is nearly 0.08 less than opposed |
|
#7 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
you can put Loadlinecalibration on enabled ,if board this offers feature. then becomes in bios opposed one worth ,also identically assumed . and this high schwankungen well-balanced .
|
|
#8 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
A discrepancy from up to 0,1 V between BIOS setting and load Vcore under Prime95 is normal and Intel specification corresponds. (headwords: Vdroop, Voffset)
MfG Monday |
|
#9 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
Only the fact that it is here about a processor AMD.
, Nevertheless, should not be different this with much.
|
|
#10 ()
|
|||
|
|||
Vcore variation
Fact, this is valid for that, however resembles so far I know.
![]() The physically unavoidable tension points can also not spirit away AMD. (I should look rather sometimes in the signatures...) MfG Monday |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|