|
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
Hello together, the D0 stepping is out already a while. Indeed, the auth. X Xgbarkeit is still begrentzt. The prices lie approx.. with
233XX X and the following X Xr C0 & 255XX X and the following X Xr D0 question: Is the surcharge worthwhile? Having already somebody Erahrungen with X Xbertakten / Temps? having to do on 1 gigabyte EX58 UD5 run! I know this question it was already put certainly. W X X re, nevertheless, shh X Xn what new to h X Xren.:jumpin Greetz R@IDXX X N |
|
#2 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
If you do not consider Xbertaktung or not excessively, then wirds probably do also the C0 Stepping. The D0 stands supposedly more tension at lower temperatures, d.h. with good cooling the D0 is worthwhile roughly respectedly from 3,6 GHz upward.
short remark No.. 1: To recognise properly around the D0 Stepping, is for most Boards BIOS update urgently. short remark No.. 2: "Xbertakten" comes from the word "Tact", not from the word "Stapler"
|
|
#3 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
Has no one else obstructed then still nen D0 and can say what to his values?
in the list OC are listed by the Core i7 920 only C0 up to now. However, the Xeon UP in 3520 in D0 reach improves ergebnisse. Would like to reach, actually, with i920 also 3800Mhz! With nen Mugen 2? |
|
#4 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
Every Cpu differently behaves. Nobody can say you which Stepping with which tension where comes; it can reach i920 C0 higher tact than D0, but already with 3,Be 2Ghz end. To reach the chance a higher tact is presumably higher with D0 Stepping a little, but the standard dispersion is probably the main factor.
|
|
#5 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
233XX X and the following X Xr C0 & 255XX X and the following X Xr D0
apparently no more it praises today have liked substantially with vv the D0 and the following X Xr 227euro 233XX X and the following X Xr C0 & 255XX X and the following X Xr D0 geizhals.at / eu / a366185.html |
|
#6 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
simply buy yourselves new stepping and well.
|
|
#7 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
D0!
Always the newest Steppings take around bugs ala TLB (ha, to go my Inizalien ) from the way and to have better qualities (More solidly, less TDP, less consumption, less W X X rmeerzuegung, nevertheless, defective functions (this was with auto OC. at the beginning thus) and Co..)22XX X with nem 1000XX X PC, in it w X Xrd I do not save. |
|
#8 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
Intel TLB bug is already for umpteen processor generations in it, only Intel in her documentations like one has described him handles / has prevented, and thus also write all her programmes. I was eradicated bezweifel in the D0 Stepping this bug.
|
|
#9 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
D0 should been supposedly better OCen. My C0 agree I, however, as an example with only 1,From 184v to 3,5 Ghz This are 0,05v less tension than Default and an Erh X Xhung about 32% of tact... W X Xrd do not promise to me much from the D0, nevertheless, with the same price prefer it. 20XX X this is never ever worth. To me pers X Xnlich w X X re it up to 5XX X worth.
|
|
#10 ()
|
|||
|
|||
i920 C0 versus i920 D0
good D0 he go with 1,2 volts on 4 GHz
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|