|
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1 ()
|
|||
|
|||
net part change or keep?
hallo jungs!
at that time I have bought in mine grXXenwahn coolermaster realpower m850 LINK ( www.alternate.de/html/solrSearch/toArticle.html?articleId=212897&query=m850&referer =detail&link=solrSearch%2Flisting.productDetails) it is only thus I hold nothing from sli/cf and belong meanwhile rather to undervoltern. desweiteren I am approx. 98% nutzungsdauer in inet or comparable idlet he only thus before himself. that is I use approximate 200watt. this becomes in next zeit rather less there gtx280 than beispiel in idle clearly less needs than my present 8800gtx she asks: it is bad for netzteil if it only with we say sometimes 10% is used to capacity? I have had a look test on 80plus page and sometimes so skip I then, nevertheless, still on 80% effektivitXt would have to come, properly? if they answer + should be then there would be, actually, nobody grund another to shop? |
|
#2 ()
|
|||
|
|||
net part change or keep?
yes, and XD
if you can well resell it , then sell this! however, I would keep it , since the pair of percent then the new stream NT saves with it you get then neupreis hard again purely we say sometimes this your PC 150 W in the Idle needs (everything thus Pi sometimes daumen respectedly) your NT > with 74% of >202W new 80% = 187,5 W , moreover, thereby this is hardly loaded your NT , if it runs quietly and lebensdauer also is very much very high XD |
|
#3 ()
|
|||
|
|||
net part change or keep?
I wXrd the net part keep, since if you your PC arm then brauchste to you no worries once more to make nen new NT.
|
|
#4 ()
|
|||
|
|||
net part change or keep?
Your net part moves only so much from the tin like the obstructed components. Only because you have obstructed 800 watts of net part heist this not you more uses. It comes just on it to what your components verbaruchen 800 W refer to the maximum achievement of the net part. You will have the same consumption with a smaller net part and then maybe the efficiency is worse.
|
|
#5 ()
|
|||
|
|||
net part change or keep?
to me quite clearly am nobody blXdi ^^ goes for me therefore I with nem smaller netzteil higher relative belastung would have with nt more actually works.. I become sometimes long what I still thus for it would agree.. because I will lay out certainly net for a smaller one
|
|
#6 ()
|
|||
|
|||
net part change or keep?
@ Giraffe's lip: h X X? When should the efficiency be worse? With a small NT?
@ M X XGGES: when have you bought your NT? If it still rest guarantee has l X X sst to itself certainly well sell. I think sometimes, the fact that you can buy then a really dimensioned one from the money, because d X Xrften still some remain XX X uros X Xbrig. I w X Xrds simply with high start price with the bay reinstellen. There you will never be of use anyhow SLI/CF, if this is pointless gro X Xe NT and the following X Xr you.@ Tinpoint: with the life span I can agree to you, but why everybody states, the fact that gro X Xes NT should be quieter with low extent of utilisation? Why had to go z.B. 120 he L X Xfter 100 W of loss achievement in 800 W NT more actually abf X Xhren than in 500 W NT? |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|